What process should you implement for managing code updates in Terraform templates when multiple engineers work on the same codebase?

Implementing peer code reviews when managing code updates in Terraform templates, particularly in a collaborative environment, provides several benefits that enhance code quality and team communication.

Establishing a code review process allows team members to examine each other's work systematically before merging it into the main codebase. This practice helps to catch errors or potential issues early, ensures that code adheres to organizational standards and best practices, and facilitates knowledge sharing among team members. By having multiple eyes on the code, collaborative discussions can occur regarding architectural decisions or the use of specific Terraform features, leading to a more robust and maintainable codebase.

Additionally, peer reviews can improve the onboarding process for new team members, as they provide insights into the established coding styles and practices of the team. This ensures the codebase remains consistent and the Terraform configuration files are both understandable and efficient.

In contrast, while allowing daily merges from developers can lead to quicker integration, it may not provide the thorough evaluation that peer code reviews ensure. Storing code in Cloud Storage may not provide the same collaborative advantages or maintainability as a version control system with established review processes. Using local files for versioning overlooks centralization and can lead to issues with synchronization and tracking changes effectively. These alternatives lack the structured collaboration provided